Mt. 4:12, 18-23:
12 Now when Jesus heard that John had been arrested, he withdrew to Galilee. ... 18 As he walked by the Sea of Galilee, he saw two brothers, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea for they were fishermen.
19 And he said to them, "Follow me, and I will make you fish for people." 20 Immediately they left their nets and followed him. 21 As he went from there, he saw two other brothers, James son of Zebedee and his brother John, in the boat with their father Zebedee, mending their nets, and he called them. 22 Immediately they left the boat and their father, and followed him.
23 Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the good news of the kingdom and curing every disease and every sickness among the people.
A young lady was accosted by her father one morning after she had
come in very late from a date with her newest boyfriend. Dad demanded to know
why she had allowed him to keep her out until well after midnight. “Oh, Daddy,”
she exclaimed, “he just has that certain something!”
Dad reflected on the young man’s appearance when he had arrived
the night before: he was not especially well mannered, he had ragged hair, wore
baggy clothes of no particular fashion, and drove a dirty car. “Well,” Dad told
daughter, “he may have that certain something, but it would be much better if
he had something certain.”
I wonder why Simon Peter and Andrew dropped their fishing trade
and walked off after Jesus when he told them to do so. The Gospel gives no
indication that they knew Jesus before this time, but they might have known him
or at least known about him. In either event, when Jesus said, “Come,” they
followed. Then the brothers James and John did the same when Jesus called them,
leaving their hapless father to mend nets alone.
Was Jesus’s charisma, that “certain something,” so strong that
grown men engaged in their trade would just drop it – immediately – when he
said to?
Few people are blessed with such charisma. Everyone else has to
develop high expertise to be successful leaders. They have something certain –
competence. People do not follow these leaders because they are charismatic or
personable. For every Robert E. Lee whose regal appearance and courtly demeanor
could cause his soldiers to weep with devotion, there are a dozen like U. S.
Grant, whose appearance was uninspiring and mannerisms dull to all who met him.
But Grant’s competence was legendary.
Charismatic leaders cause change, and so do competent leaders.
When charisma and competence combine in one person, an explosion of change
results. George Washington combined these two natures. So did Billy Graham.
Jesus may have combined charisma and competence so supremely that
his call to follow was irresistible, which would explain very well why men and
later, women, would just up and leave their homes and way of life to follow
him. But to follow Christ was different than following Washington across the
Delaware River one night and different than helping Billy Graham build the
furthest-reaching ministry the world has ever known. Washington’s soldiers and
Graham’s workers had first devoted themselves to a cause greater than all of
them – the former to freedom and the latter to evangelism. They had a prior
commitment to the larger mission, and to accept the leadership of Washington or
Graham resulted from their commitment rather than caused it.
Such was not the case when Jesus walked along the lakeshore. No
doubt these four fishermen were religious. They probably worshiped faithfully
at the synagogue and made the necessary pilgrimages to Jerusalem for Passover.
But there was no cause Jesus served to which Simon, Andrew, James, and John had
already committed themselves. There was no Gospel yet, there was no church yet,
there were no great social or political movements Jesus headed. There were,
apparently, no prior points of contact between Jesus and the four men. Yet when
Jesus simply told them, come, and they dropped their work and went.
The men could not yet have known of Jesus’ unequaled competence.
Jesus was an expert prophet, teacher, preacher, and healer; his expertise in
conducting his ministry was unparalleled. He made no mistakes. He did not waver
from his mission even when arrest and cruel death threatened. This fantastic
level of competence is not hard to accept if one has already accepted the fact
that Jesus was the son of God, and that in him dwelt the godhead fully. But
none of the disciples knew any of this when they began to follow him. Jesus was
still mostly unknown to them when they left their work and homes to follow him.
And Jesus may not have been very charismatic. Isaiah prophesied of
the messiah in another passage that, “He had no beauty or majesty to attract us
to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him” (Isa 53:2). Jesus
may well have been a plain-vanilla sort of man to look at, with no imposing
physical presence. We don’t know.
So the riddle of what made these men follow Jesus remains a
riddle.
“A reasonable response to his command ‘Follow me’ would be ‘Where are you going?’ The fishermen do not yet know the destination, which they must learn along the way. . . . The fishermen are already at work, already doing something useful and important, thus they are not looking for a new life. Jesus’ call does not fill an obvious vacuum or meet an obvious need in their lives, but, like the call of prophets in the Hebrew Bible, it is intrusive and disruptive, calling them away from work and family” (NIB).
Jesus did not call the fishermen to admire him or accept his
principles, but to follow him personally. Throughout the gospel accounts, Jesus
made it clear that those who followed him were to be devoted to him personally.
To what degree Jesus understood he was God-in-the-flesh is argued among New
Testament scholars; his self-awareness of his deity seems stronger in some
parts of the gospels than in others. But it cannot be doubted that Jesus saw a
co-identity between his work and the work of God and thus believed that loyalty
to him and loyalty to God were so close that the difference was nil. In fact,
Jesus said that God enabled people to follow him.
His call to follow him was primarily to follow him personally,
not to adhere to some ethical principle, success program, political campaign or
even a ministry of compassion. The ethics and ministry of the apostles and the
church grew out of personal loyalty to Christ, but before all, there was
loyalty to Christ himself. The first devotion of the apostles was not to good
works, or to faith statements, or to social justice, or to religious
propositions, or to a church organization. It was personally to Jesus Christ.
We don’t easily realize what an extraordinary thing this is.
Throughout history there have been many men who demanded personal oaths of
loyalty, but even the best results have been tragic, more often downright evil.
Here is a short list of examples, none of which turned out well, most of which
became evil outright:
- The cult of the Roman Caesars that began during Jesus’ lifetime,
- In the late 1700s, the rule of the French monarchy,
- Adolf Hitler, who required the proud German army officer corps to pledge its honor and loyalty to him personally rather than the German nation,
- The cult of the Japanese emperor,
- American Jim Jones founded a “People’s Temple” and demanded complete obedience, even to requiring all 900 of them to drink poisoned Kool-Aid and die in 1978.
The historical record is not kind to those who make themselves the
first and foremost object of loyalty or worship for people. Yet Jesus of
Nazareth is a singular distinction. He did not found a “Jesus cult.” His
disciples sometimes got into serious arguments about what following Christ
meant, and Jesus just let them work it out. Jesus would patiently explain what
his teachings meant when the disciples didn’t understand, but he never
attempted to compel people to follow him. They were free to answer his call or
not. And some changed their minds: Jesus was abandoned wholesale by many
disciples in John’s Gospel, and Jesus just let them go without a word. On the
night he was arrested, Jesus seemed more pitiable than heroic in Gethsemane.
Before the soldiers arrived, he had to plead with someone to stay awake with
him. Then his disciples abandoned him as the soldiers took him away. Jesus was
either history’s most spectacular blunderer in creating a personal cult about
himself, or he was so purely good that complete devotion to him personally
could serve only God’s good purposes, even when that devotion faltered.
But Jesus’ tragedy and triumph were far in the future when Jesus
walked along the lakeshore summoning the two sets of brothers. We are no closer
than before in understanding why these men, successful in their trade, would
give it up to follow Jesus with just a word of a summons.
Perhaps we need to remember that the gospels don’t quite tell
history in the way we think of history. The gospels are not simply accounts of
what happened. When their writers set the story down, they knew how it would
end. From the beginning of these accounts, Jesus is known to them as the Risen
One. Thus, the individual motives that each disciple may have had in following
Jesus at the beginning of his ministry do not seem very important. The point is
that they did follow the One they later came to know as their risen Lord.
Matthew simply ascribes to all of them, including himself,
“a common denominator: ... People become believers by the power of
Jesus’ word; they follow him because he has spoken to them, and his word
generates faith. For Matthew, Jesus’ call to discipleship was spoken not only
to a few disciples in first-century Galilee but to the church throughout
history (28:20). ... In and through the words and deeds of preachers,
missionaries, teachers, family, friends, and the nameless doers of Christian
service, the voice of the Son of Man continues to speak and to generate faith”
(NIB).
So for Matthew and for the church in every time and place, the
call to follow is given to us just as it was to these four men beside the
lakeshore. Yet only a few of us will immediately drop everything to follow him.
(I certainly didn’t!) The rest of us will wrestle with the call. We’ll
temporize and delay. We’ll ask for the details of the program and want to have
the objective explained to us. Or we’ll show Jesus all the other work we have
to do and all the obligations we have, or we’ll love our leisure time too much
and treasure our entertainments and pastimes.
Jesus has heard it all before. He won’t try to coerce us into following him, and we sure can’t talk him out of calling us. To all our objections, Jesus makes no argument. He simply says, “Come and follow me” and walks on. He will do this over and over and over, until we finally realize that all our encumbrances and reasons to go on with life as usual mean not a thing any longer, not to Jesus, not to us, and then we have to follow him – not to join a new project or find a new cause, but simply to be with him and to have him be with us.