Jesus’ Wife fragment judged a fake « Daniel B. Wallace:
Not that this is a surprise:
“News flash: Harvard Theological Review has decided not to publish Karen King¹s paper on the Coptic papyrus fragment on the grounds that the fragment is probably a fake.” This from an email Dr. Craig Evans, the Payzant Distinguished Professor of New Testament at Acadia University and Divinity College, sent to me earlier today. He said that Helmut Koester (Harvard University), Bentley Layton (Yale University), Stephen Emmel (University of Münster), and Gesine Robinson (Claremont Graduate School)–all first-rate scholars in Coptic studies–have weighed in and have found the fragment wanting. No doubt Francis Watson’s comprehensive work showing the fragment’s dependence on the Gospel of Thomas was a contributing factor for this judgment, as well as the rather odd look of the Coptic that already raised several questions as to its authenticity.
We are not blind, are we? Well . . .
The Gospel passage for today is the first 14 verses of the Gospel of John. It is a long passage so rather than include it it here, I offer t...
-
OMG! What if Trump orders this before Jan. 20! But that cannot happen, read on to see why - and why Nancy Pelosi's urging of a military ...
-
I've just returned from three days of the Bishop's Convocation of the Tennessee and Memphis Conferences of the United Methodist Chur...
-
We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give . Luke 12.13-21 13 Someone in the crowd said to him, “Teacher, tell ...